<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speculations on Google Chrome OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joconner.com/2009/07/speculations-on-google-chrome-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joconner.com/2009/07/speculations-on-google-chrome-os/</link>
	<description>Creating global software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:26:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corn</title>
		<link>http://joconner.com/2009/07/speculations-on-google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Corn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joconner.com/2009/07/speculations-on-google-chrome-os/#comment-207</guid>
		<description>PC World released a list of the top 10 Google Chrome Add-ons. http://www.pcworld.com/article/185744/top_10_chrome_browser_add_ons.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PC World released a list of the top 10 Google Chrome Add-ons. <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/185744/top_10_chrome_browser_add_ons.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcworld.com/article/185744/top_10_chrome_browser_add_ons.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radarcg</title>
		<link>http://joconner.com/2009/07/speculations-on-google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>radarcg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joconner.com/2009/07/speculations-on-google-chrome-os/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Nice article! Great predictions. I&#039;m not sure I agree that the Delvik VM will be used because I don&#039;t think the netbooks are as restrictive, thereby allowing Google to use a richer, if not completely standard Java VM.

Oh, and just a minor correction. Google actually can and does claim Android as being based on Java. They don&#039;t need to state &quot;Java-like&quot;. However, they are restricted to claiming the usage of the language rather than the platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article! Great predictions. I&#8217;m not sure I agree that the Delvik VM will be used because I don&#8217;t think the netbooks are as restrictive, thereby allowing Google to use a richer, if not completely standard Java VM.</p>
<p>Oh, and just a minor correction. Google actually can and does claim Android as being based on Java. They don&#8217;t need to state &#8220;Java-like&#8221;. However, they are restricted to claiming the usage of the language rather than the platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
